Most likely, it's not a concern, as the fundamental programming of driverless cars are to: a) avoid collisions at all costs b) follow all traffic laws perfectly
Given that the default action if anything unexpected happens is to stop and safe the vehicle, using any of the automated cars currently in development in this manner would end very poorly for someone trying to evade pursuit. On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah <rmsl...@shaw.ca> wrote: > http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-28344219 > > Seems to me that nobody in the FBI is reading the traffic fatality > statistics > obtained on cars driven by humans. > > (OK, yes, the feebies seem to be concerned about automated cars that allow > the > passenger to shoot back at you. But isn't that already happening anyway?) > > ====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer) > rsl...@vcn.bc.ca sl...@victoria.tc.ca rsl...@computercrime.org > Like one who takes away a garment on a cold day, or like vinegar > poured on soda, is one who sings songs to a heavy heart. Prov. 25:20 > victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm http://www.infosecbc.org/links > http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/ > http://twitter.com/rslade > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. >
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
