I coded a php project in a similar style to fusebox.  A lot of fusebox 
idioms aren't really neccesary, becuase PHP has user defined functions, as 
well as rudimentary objects!  Fusebox seems designed partially to deal with 
ColdFusion's lack of both of these things. But the basic idea of the index 
file can be carried over; everything else I did was pretty ad hoc and I was 
never sure the cleanest way to do it. When to put functionality in a 
function, when to put it in a seperate template that was called with the 
equivelent of 'include', when to do something else entirely, when to use an 
object. I kind of played it all by ear.

--Jonathan

At 07:22 PM 7/11/2000 +0800, you wrote:
>this is OT, regarding php. i'm asking here 'coz i think more CF people know
>php than php people know CF. would appreciate if someone can answer me off
>list.
>
>i'm tasked to do a site with php and mysql, because of the cost involved
>(must be free). this is my first time with both, but that is ok. i just want
>to know if anyone who has implemented a php site using similar methodolody
>as fusebox.
>
>i've read the article at phpbuilder.com concerning webbox (which is derived
>from fusebox), but i think it is not as good as fusebox. (is there other
>place that describe such methods?)
>
>i would also like to know whether there is anything similar to the function
>of <CF_BODYCONTENT> (for use by app_Layout.cfm), as well as Application.cfm
>(processed before any other templates).
>
>
>Thanks in advanced!
>
>-ken
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To Unsubscribe visit 
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or 
>send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in 
>the body.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.

Reply via email to