-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Thank you, yes it does make more sense. It's basically a means to save a
> number of rarely changing variables in memory to increase performance.
> There certainly are a lot of possible mistakes that can be made very
> easily,
> though.
I'm confused about the locks then. I thought locks would decrease
performance as well. If have to put blocks around all the blocks of code,
is there a performance hit that conceivably outweighs the gains of only
setting the variable once?
For instance, if the DSN is stored as an application variable (which makes
sense... at least it meets the criterion I'm seeing mentioned) then I have
to put locks around all the queries. Is that efficient?
c
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt - http://irfaiad.virtualave.net/
Comment: PGP Signed for message verification and/or encryption
Comment: KeyID: 0xD68B61E851046CFD
iQA/AwUBOdKwLNaLYehRBGz9EQL/TgCgjhAMKKoQDZD8seBd6SV9r3JivmMAoIy1
NMsLxDBWXP+z9i18NXSAo27r
=jXIt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
