While the app_model is cool and we're using it here (obviously since we're in the same office). I think its a bit overkill and a carefully thought out custom app_layout.cfm with the bodycontent tag, (and few other nifty tags like cf_htmlhead give you just about everything you'd get with app_model.cfm and possibly less overhead. (not that we've got an issue with that as it does run pretty darn quick.) I'm not saying the app_model way is wrong, it does work and works well. I just don't feel the added ability to append headers and prepend footers really buys me enough to make it worth while, and if I need that functionality its just a couple of extra lines added to my customized app_layout.cfm. Fred ----- Original Message ----- From: "craig girard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Idea? > I use quite a few request scope variable, but I also use Gabe Roffman's > app_model (best idea of 2000?). It works wonderful, but you do have to > remember which variables are global, but thats not hard. It does NOT > however convert url and form vars to request scope, just attribute scope. > > Craig > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nat Papovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:39 AM > To: Fusebox > Subject: RE: Idea? > > > ...and since Hal includes entire Fuseboxes within other Fuseboxes (as we all > should be doing ;) ), that eliminates module independance. > > Nat Papovich > ICQ 32676414 > "If it was hard to write," > says the Real Programmer, > "it should be hard to understand." > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 10:20 PM > To: Fusebox > Subject: RE: Idea? > > > Not just in custom tags, but in any included pages as well. > > -----Original Message----- > From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 12:59 AM > To: Fusebox > Subject: RE: Idea? > > > I'm trying to understand how a request scoped variable that > > 1. Is unique to a user, and > 2. Dies with a new page request > > can have an unexpected value in other nooks and crannies in an > application. > > Is the *real* problem only with custom tags? > > best, paul > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > -- > To Unsubscribe visit > http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or > send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in > the body. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
