than = then
don't you hate those type of typos?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian P. Doyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 8:35 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Idea? and OT posts
I've actually become more annoyed at the annoyance of OT posts (if that
makes any sense). One of the reasons that I pay much more attention to this
list rather than others is that it seems to be more of a community forum
than a technical mailing list (and I _like_ that). That means that having a
completely OT discussion is a welcome change.
My opinion? Unsubscribe. If we stop questioning posts and keeping levity up
than our community will die. And I for one don't want that to happen.
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Funaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 7:28 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Idea?
<CF_SoapBox AnnoyanceLevel = "rising">
I rarely complain about list topics and postings... god knows I've done my
share of posting off-topic. But this stuff is almost enough to make me
unsubscribe from this list. Hal's explanation is plenty clear. And at the
risk of sounding like a brown-noser, Hal is a recognized authority in this
field; I trust what he says, and (especially) if you are new to fusebox, so
should you. It's just ridiculous to see him placed practically on the
defensive over something as silly as this, AND it's cluttering up the list.
Hal, you need not apologize; you were quite clear.
If you REALLY don't understand it, do what we all have to do on a regular
basis -- build some stupid frickin' pages, and TEST IT YOURSELF until you
understand it YOUR way. Then, by all means, offer your own explanation for
what you find. Another way of describing something is always welcome...
just stop hammering the busy gurus (who take their time to help us in just
about every way, almost to a fault!) with distracting petty nomenclature and
description issues.
</CFSOAPBOX>
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Slatoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 6:56 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Idea?
Are those trading cards local or global? :)
At 06:49 PM 10/10/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Trading cards!
>
>"I'll trade you an application and an attributes for a request."
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Slatoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 6:50 PM
>To: Fusebox
>Subject: RE: Idea?
>
>
>I think there needs to be a graphical representation of all scoped
>variables so that everyone can understand. Maybe nice glossy 8 x 10s with a
>paragraph on the back of each one.
>
>At 06:42 PM 10/10/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >This is silly. If my language was misleading to anyone, I apologize. I
try
> >to be very careful with words. I only meant to indicate, as I've said,
that
> >request was UNLIKE client and session variables. We're both saying
exactly
> >the same thing. I've said it was like a local variable--only available to
> >all files included or called in a single http request. I don't think I
can
> >make it any clearer.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Chris Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 6:21 PM
> >To: Fusebox
> >Subject: RE: Idea?
> >
> >
> > >Chris, I'm not trying to be misleading at all. In fact, I'm trying to
be
> >the
> > >opposite. If you look over all the posts I've written on this, I've
>clearly
> > >said the request scope is NOT a shared scope (which is why it doesn't
>need
> > >to be locked). I was just trying to get the point across that request
is
> >NOT
> > >tied to a single user, unlike client and session.
> >
> >Saying that it's not tied to a single user is the misleading part. A
>single
> >HTTP request cannot be shared by more than one user. Therefore, the
>request
> >scope is (by definition) tied to a single user.
> >
> >How are you defining "tied"?
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-
> >--
> >To Unsubscribe visit
> >http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox
or
> >send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
> >the body.
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---
> >To Unsubscribe visit
> >http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox
or
> >send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
> >the body.
>
>Michael Slatoff
>www.slatoff.com
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>--
>To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or
>send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
>the body.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or
>send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
>the body.
Michael Slatoff
www.slatoff.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
