There is a thread on cf-talk about Fusebox. Dave Watts a long time
'disbeliever' in fusebox brought up a good point...
He uses a lot of <cfobject> calls and doesn't see the point in having a
file with a single line on it for calling the <cfobject> tag. Because
that's "encapsulating the encapsulation". The more i thought about it,
the more I realize he's totally right. I think we should add to the
fusebox specs: make <cfobject> calls directly from the <cfcase>
statements in the index.cfm files.
The reason is that <cfobject> calls are essentially like a <cfmodule> or
<cfinclude> or a <cf_sometag> call in that the <cfobject> itself
contains the business logic.
What does everyone think?
If we do this should there be a naming convention for classes in
<cfobject>?
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
