that version was floating around for a while then was found to have
problems.... the issue with getting rid of app_layout.cfm is that your
headers and footers have to deal with the caller scope which becomes a
huge pain in the neck, especially if you're reusing templates in your
headers/footers that are also used in the body. including app_layout
makes it a whole lot easier.
Steve Nelson
http://www.SecretAgents.com
Tools for Fusebox Developers
Ryan wrote:
>
> I started reading the book this weekend. I was reading about
> CF_BODYCONTENT, it says that the newer version does not
> require app_layout.cfm, its all taken care of in the BODYCONTENT
> tag now. But when I tried to make a sample fusebox application
> this weekend (my first), I could not get anything to display
> until I cfincluded the app_layout.cfm file in index.cfm, right after
> the closing BODYCONTENT tag.
>
> So where is the newer version the book mentions that doesn't need
> the app_layout.cfm file? The version of CF_BODYCONTENT I was using
> was one I grabbed off the custom tags section of the fusebox site
> yesterday.
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Ryan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a
>message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
