I'm not interested in going whole hog with the 800+ pages of documentation
that make up the OMG UML 1.3 spec. I just want to skim off the best parts
regarding modeling an app before writing the code.
The dangling carrot from the stick is the goal of UML writing the code for
you, so far that you properly model the app. WithClass 2000 can do this
(within reason) with C++, VB, ASP (hah! what an insult!), but not CF
(naturally). However, their product is scriptable to teach it other dev
languages, and I'm thinking Fusebox.
I've got a multi-tiered goal here...
1. Get UML (fUseML, actually) figured enough to do good pre-code app
modeling
2. Write good fusedocs based on the modeling
3. Build an app using this approach
4. If successful in step 3, use the UML/Fuseodc approch as a method for
defining applications, and get somebody else to write the actual code.
Its pretty straightforward, I want to architect the apps more than I want to
actually write the code....
Alan McCollough
Web Programmer
Allaire Certified ColdFusion Developer
Alaska Native Medical Center
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Helms [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 9:58 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: FUSEDOC compiler
>
> Alan,
>
> I was using it for making diagrams of a Fusebox architecture. Jeff took it
> way past this point and had it actually generate the Fusestubs in the
> appropriate directories. I've looked at UML, and it's great for modeling
> problems to OO solutions. I think it's not particularly appropriate for
> Fusebox. Obviously, just my opinion...
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
