Ermmm, I'm rather hesitant when the author of the article has a interest
in one of the products he reviews.
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Peaslee [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: arguments **against** fusebox
Rob,
There is a good article that compares different cold fusion application
frameworks (and fusebox as a methodology) in sys-con's ColdFusion
Developer's Journal. The article list pros and cons of each
framework/methodology.
You can find the article at http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/
Just go to 'featured articles' in the left column and then click on the
article titled 'Propel Your ColdFusion Projects with Application
Frameworks'
in Volume: 2 Issue: 11.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Schuff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 1:01 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: arguments **against** fusebox
>
>
> Greetings folks,
>
> As a newcomer to CF and even newer to fusebox I am seeking all the info I
> can possibly digest. Fusebox certainly looks like a solid
> methodology, but
> like anyone reviewing such a methodology, I would like to see
> "both sides of
> the coin". Can anyone point me to criticisms/ perceived weaknesses
(valid
> or not) of FB?
>
>
> thanks
>
> rob
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Robert Schuff Bull Run Software
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Portland, OR USA
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
