That has nothing to do with the point I was trying to
make.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brandon Paolin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 10:32 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: Re: passing page name through url
>
>
> not only is it quicker to code, but its quicker to execute.
>
> <cfif fileexists("#request.path#\#request.page#")>
>     <cfinclude template="#request.page#">
> </cfif>
>
> runs faster than the cfswitch
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick McElhaney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 10:12 AM
> Subject: RE: passing page name through url
>
>
> > > At 09:25 1/12/01 -0500, you wrote:
> > > >As I don my flame retardant suit and dunce hat,
> > > >I can't help but wonder aloud, what is the point? :)
> > >
> > > you wouldn't have to add case statements all the time, every time you
> > > add a fuseaction. It would just work after you drop the file in there.
> > > I've thought about doing this, but wondered if there was security
> > > concerns or other problems..
> > >
> > So it's basically a hack to break the fusebox model
> > when it saves 30 seconds of coding? Doesn't that create
> > an ugly hybrid that's impossible to maintain?
> >
> > If you insist on being this lazy, may I offer a
> > suggestion that at least won't compromise security and
> > butcher FB's beautiful interface?
> >
> > <cfswitch expression="#attributes.fuseaction#">
> >   <cfcase value="aFuseAction">
> >     <cfinclude template="act_dosomething.cfm">
> >     <cfinclude template="dsp_showsomething.cfm">
> >   </cfcase>
> >   ...
> >   <cfdefaultcase>
> >     <cftry>
> >       <cinclude template="FUS_#attributes.fuseaction#.cfm">
> >     </cftry>
> >   </cfdefaultcase>
> > </cfswitch>
> >
> > This way you can actually add a new fuseaction by
> > creating a file named FUS_newfuseactionname.CFM
> >
> > I can see how this technique can be used as an
> > iterative step in development, especially when
> > converting an existing app, but still wouldn't want to
> > see it in a production enviorment.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to