> Has anyone ever considered the idea of, rather than
> using a lengthy cfcase statement, storing fuseactions
> in variables?
Patrick,
Lots of people. But they're missing the point of Fusebox, IMO... index.cfm
is an application's (or circuit's) roadmap. Without those clearly defined
CFCASE signposts pointing the way, there's no real reason to route
everything through index.cfm in the first place.
And of course, on a pragmatic level, a given CFCASE may contain more than
includes. Mine often contain CFPARAMs, CFMODULE calls, and so on.
> Why write the same code over and
> over?
For my part, I *don't* write the same code over and over.
--
Roger
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
