Appreciated -- and we are now using client vars for all of our current &
future apps; but we have many *legacy* apps using session vars.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:37 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: clustercats (and fusebox)
Kelly,
The problem with sticky sessions in general is that it goes against the idea
of clustering and replication across multiple machines. These problems can
be solved if, instead of session variables, you use client variables and
store this information in a central database.
Hal Helms
== See ColdFusionTraining.com for info on "Best Practices with ColdFusion &
Fusebox" training ==
-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly Tetterton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:18 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: OT: clustercats (and fusebox)
Has anyone used a fusebox app in a clustercats environment?
Also, we have several legacy apps that use session variables, and although
it seems clear that we can use sticky sessions for those, I've been ready
that clustercats can't handle sticky sessions *and* absolute urls (ie, for
ssl checkouts) and that it can only handle up to 4 virtual web sites on a
single machine -- but this info might be outdated.
Anyone?
Kelly Tetterton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.duodesign.com
duoDesign eBusiness Accelerator
1007 Church Street, Suite 510
Evanston IL 60201
847-491-3142 direct
847-491-3000 main
847-491-3100 fax
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
