Yes, otherwise it does run up the ladder. If you have application.cfm in
your directory, CF will not continue up the directory tree looking for
onRequestEnd.cfm.
Hal Helms
== See ColdFusionTraining.com for info on "Best Practices with ColdFusion &
Fusebox" training ==
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: onRequestEnd.cfm
Does CF treat the application.cfm the same way? I was wondering about this
when using fusebox because you typically don't use an application.cfm in
fusebox development. Should we at least put a blank application.cfm in our
application roots also so our apps don't go searching all the way up the
directory structure looking for one?
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Beard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 11:25 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: onRequestEnd.cfm
Was told something recently that I hear was a "michael dinowitz trick" that
everyone may not be aware of. You should make a OnRequestEnd.cfm in the
root of your cf applications, even if it is blank (needs to contain atleast
a comment). Otherwise cf takes a performance hit when it recurses all the
way to the root looking for one.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
