>From studying the SimpleContactManager I see the XFA being passed into the included template. In any of those templates the fusedocs don't show that one or any of the XFA will be passed out. Shouldn't they be? I expected to see this... || Atributes || --> XFA.continue: Fuseaction <-- [XFA.continue]: Fuseaction or even this if there is one the one XFA possible. || Atributes || <-> XFA.continue: : Fuseaction Ronan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
- RE: Question: Why the change from RFA to XFA method... Ronan O'Donohoe
- Re: Question: Why the change from RFA to XFA m... John Quarto-vonTivadar
- RE: Question: Why the change from RFA to X... Nat Papovich
- Re: Question: Why the change from RFA ... John Quarto-vonTivadar
- RE: Question: Why the change from ... Mike Craig
- RE: Question: Why the change from ... Hal Helms
- RE: Question: Why the change ... Jeff Peters
- RE: Question: Why the change from RFA to XFA m... Ken Beard
- RE: Question: Why the change from RFA to XFA method... BOROVOY Noam
- RE: Question: Why the change from RFA to XFA method... Ronan O'Donohoe
- RE: Question: Why the change from RFA to XFA m... Hal Helms
- Re: Question: Why the change from RFA to XFA m... John Quarto-vonTivadar
- Re: Question: Why the change from RFA to XFA method... Ken Beard
