This may seem a simple question but.... would it be easier to cfinclude your
javascript functions inside your dsp pages? I also keep a jsp folder with my
javascript functions, but refer to them in my index.cfm. I just cfinclude
them in the appropriate display page.
-george
>From: Kevin Bridges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Fusebox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Javascript fuse style question
>Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:19:20 -0700
>
>We have a pretty large amount of javascript that is in some of the apps we
>are doing. Most of the functions are conditional and not all will be used
>in every scenario, but they all need to be accessible to the page. A good
>deal of the functions need to hit a hidden frame to perform queries and
>return specific information. Basically what we were developing were huge
>blocks of javascript functions inside of our fusebox pages that could
>potentially take a good deal of time to trouble shoot ... seemed to counter
>the simplicity of a fusebox app.
>
>Soooo came up with the idea of creating a jsp directory inside the fuse to
>store jsp_whatever.cfm where a jsp_ page stores a single javascript
>function. All we need now is this function:
>
>function CallJavaScript(x) {
> Location =
>"index.cfm?FuseAction=CallJavaScript&<cfoutput>#client.urltoken#</cfoutput>&
>Function=" + x;
> parent.JavaScriptFrame.location = Location;
>}
>
>it hits the hidden frame and calls the necessary function that does
>whatever
>processing on the parent frame we need. A function can even call
>additional
>functions as needed. When we hit the CallJavaScript value in our main
>switch statement we simply open another switch that checks
>attributes.Function and calls the appropriate jsp_ file.
>
>This works great and keeps the code manageable and more fusebox like ...
>however it also generates additional hits to the server and somewhat
>negates
>the beauty of the true client side pre-processing. I was wondering if
>anyone had any opinions or concerns about this method of doing this or any
>ideas about how this might slow down an application in a production
>environment.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Kevin Bridges
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
