True true,
I think the basic idea is just: <CFSET ATTRIBUTES.XFA.onEvent = handler>
I don't think we need to consider any more detailed standards. Within an
individual organisation, sure, have all the detail you want - I can't see
that this will increase the learning curve substantially for a new
developer.
As ever, my general comment is that it doesn't matter much WHAT conventions
you have, as long as you do have SOME.
See ya,
LBB.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 3:38 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: XFA's
I dunno, Emilio. I personally have never seen these type of schemes work
well. They usually are either too trivial or too inflexible to be of much
good. ...
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used by
the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to
this e-mail or attachment to it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
