Well faster is better (or is that wider is better). In any event, a slight
merging of the two (if not physically at least emotionally) might be in
order upon its release if it can help speed things up. Thanks for the
update.
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 4:51 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: CFSAVECONTENT in CF 5.0
> ?? This is over simplified but how is that really saving me anything?
Mike,
Allaire's docs state that it'll be faster that a "custom tag solution"...
meaning cf_bodycontent, I assume.
I don't plan to use it myself, mainly because I make a lotta use of a
modified cf_bodycontent that creates arrays of content... from the looks of
things, I'd still need a custom tag wrapper to make CFSAVECONTENT provide
similar functionality. But if it turns out to be a *lot* faster, well, I may
try to work around its limitations.
--
Roger
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
