You know, it's odd you should say that. When I look at Tom Cruise, I think
to myself, how can we look SO much alike and yet be two different people.
Gulp...you may just have answered that question...
Hal Helms
Team Allaire
[ See www.halhelms.com <http://www.halhelms.com> for info on training
classes ]
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Theobald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 11:42 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: OT: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
Hal, how do you know you are the ORIGINAL Hal? I mean... maybe NAT isn't the
first one to clone a Hal...
At 11:13 PM 3/22/01 -0800, Nat Papovich wrote:
>What do XFBs have to do with the attribs scope? I never put them in the
>attribs scope myself, only the local scope (and not as a structure as the
>original XFB outline mentions), and I haven't gotten a ticket yet...
>
>NAT
>
>p.s. The creation (birth?) of Mini Hal is coming along nicely.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 9:54 PM
>> To: Fusebox
>> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>>
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Part of the cost is having to prefix everything with "attributes." When
>> dealing with XFAs, etc, this gets to be a significant amount of
>> time. But I
>> agree with you about the search-engine friendly URLs. That's a
>> nice feature.
>> Score one for FormURL2Attributes.
>>
>> Hal Helms
>> Team Allaire
>> [ See www.halhelms.com <http://www.halhelms.com> for info on training
>> classes ]
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Quarto-vonTivadar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 12:01 AM
>> To: Fusebox
>> Subject: Re: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>>
>>
>>
>> > I agree--that's the only thing that's really nice about having
>> it. Again,
>> I
>> > just wonder if the cost is worth it.
>> >
>>
>>
>> somehow I missed the originating comment that must have started this.
Has
>> someone done a cost analysis to see exactly how much we are really paying
>> for the convenience?
>>
>> (as an aside, if the need for ATTRIBUTES is somewhat moot due to non FB
>> custom tag calls, and therefore only FORM and URL are in play,
>> then perhaps
>> we should need a URL2FORM.cfm or vice-versa tag. I happen to like the
>> ability to have search-engine friendly URLs)
>>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
