On 23 Mar 2001, at 13:45, Steve Nelson wrote:
> If that's the real problem then it's just a matter of some simple code
> rewrites.
>
> I just changed my copy to put everything into the attributes scope, and
> it seems to work fine. Is anyone using the #request.attributeslist#
Does using <cfset attributes = StructNew()> actually cause genuine attributes
(i.e., values passed to the app as a custom tag) to be included in the
structure as well? If not, I still suggest we deprecate the use of the Fusebox
"attributes" pseudo-scope/structure and use a structure named, say, "fba"
(whatever; but take the opportunity to make it short) in order to clarify the
difference between the genuine Attributes scope and the Fusebox structure.
For sake of clarity, formurl2attributes should become formurlattr2fba (or
whatever) so there's clear delineation between valid apps using
formurl2attributes (which won't need to be changed) and new apps using the new
structure.
- Jeff
==============================================================
| Jeffrey S. Peters | "Specialization is for insects." |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - Lazarus Long |
| PGP key for Jeffrey S. Peters at ldap://keyserver.pgp.com |
==============================================================
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
