I guess that could be useful for unit testing.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Quarto-vonTivadar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> isn't this redundant? If the Out attributes are not correctly passed out
> then they will be caught as such at the next XFA (which is presumably the
> point). Yes, testing on the outward journey is an extra layer of checking
> with virtually no overhead, I totally agree with that. But it has nothing
> to do with the *current* fuse, but rather with the *next* fuse--so it
should
> be checked by (only) the next fuse. (If fusebox were doing more module
calls
> instead of includes
> then I might be of a different mind on this)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
