Ok, can someone do me a big a favour and fill me in on who the hell stan cox
is and why stancox.com is such a big deal.
Thanks,
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brad Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 11:07 PM
Subject: RE: Stan Cox
> Jason,
>
> Grow Up! Who ever said anything about profit? I think the site has
> potential, yes, but not potential to make money. I'm not that naive. Nat
> has said several times on the list that he is NOT Stan Cox! Tell me
Jason,
> where's my wrong. I registered stancox.com. Was I supposed to ask the
list
> publicly before I did it, "Who is Stan Cox, becuase I'm going to register
> stancox.com and I want your permission." Get real. Hey Jason, I just
looked
> and JasonLoz.com is available. Can I register it just to spite you? I'm
> kidding. I'm not a jerk, just someone who wanted to continue the fun of
the
> mysterious Stan Cox.
>
> BTW, I said "nanny nanny poo poo" because I thought the replies I got were
> pretty immature and just wanted to stress the point.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Lotz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:55 PM
> > To: Fusebox
> > Subject: Re: Stan Cox
> >
> >
> > Brad,
> > You have got to be kidding me. You send an email to the list to
> > profit from
> > someone else's creation and "nanny nanny poo poo" someone when
> > they call you
> > on it? If you think it's Nat, then ask him for permission. If it's not
> > him, then shut your pie hole and sit down in the back of the room you
> > unoriginal piece of crap.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Jason
> >
> >
> > > Brad,
> > >
> > > How great of you to take advantage of a creation that wasn't
> > yours!!! Is
> > > that how you program also?? I think that the person/ persons
> > responsible
> > > for the creation of the Stan Cox alter ego will be pissed...
> > >
> > > Good job.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Brad Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 4:19 PM
> > > To: Fusebox
> > > Subject: OT: StanCox.com
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey all you Stan Cox Fans,
> > >
> > > I registered StanCox.com a few weeks ago because it was getting so
funny
> > > that I thought I'd build a ColdFuzian site selling "Rockin'
> > Horse Rockin'
> > > House" T-Shirts. I haven't gotten around to it yet.
> > >
> > > FWIW, I did NOT post the backward messages (Nat maybe?).
> > >
> > > The New Creations (new-creations.net) site was one of my first
> > > Fusbox sites
> > > (way before fusedocs) along with the other sites listed that
> > are hosted by
> > > an ISP. Thanks for the comment though! I've told them time and
> > > time again
> > > to fix the .htr "bug" as well as others but they haven't. I'll
> > be pulling
> > > them off soon and putting them on our company's server.
> > >
> > > ROCK THE HOUSE! If anyone would like to contribute ideas for
> > the official
> > > StanCox.com fan club (other than colored borders and
> > lettering), send 'em
> > > off list. I really think it has potential.
> > >
> > > Brad
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kevin Bridges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:49 AM
> > > > To: Fusebox
> > > > Subject: RE: )...secitcarP tseB saw( setubirttA no sgnisuM :ER
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > hmmm new-creations.net?
> > > >
> > > > They are running IIS and have some pretty decent security holes
> > > > ... but the
> > > > code is a very clean and well commented version of fusebox minus the
> > > > fusedocs ... you'd think someone so good at coding would at
> > > least include
> > > > fusedocs hehehe.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: David Huyck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 9:38 AM
> > > > To: Fusebox
> > > > Subject: Re: )...secitcarP tseB saw( setubirttA no sgnisuM :ER
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Truly. Check this out, too:
> > > > http://www.networksolutions.com/cgi-bin/whois/whois?STRING=stancox
> > > &STRING=Se
> > > arch
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Brian Doyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:15 AM
> > > Subject: RE: )...secitcarP tseB saw( setubirttA no sgnisuM :ER
> > >
> > >
> > > | that was indeed lame.
> > > |
> > > | -----Original Message-----
> > > | From: Can Stox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > | Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:57 AM
> > > | To: Fusebox
> > > | Subject: )...secitcarP tseB saw( setubirttA no sgnisuM :ER
> > > |
> > > |
> > > | ..esuoh 'nikcoR .esroh 'nikcoR
> > > | moc.liamtoh@xotsnac
> > > | ..natS itnA
> >
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
