When I first recommended CF for our Web site, it got blamed for everything
that went wrong on the Web server. The database administrator and network
administrator used CF for the scapegoat on all issues. We had a memory leak
issue which appeared to be ColdFusion Server (at least the way Windows NT
was showing the allocation of resources). But, after my constant denial that
it was really ColdFusion, we found that the ODBC driver was the culprit and
it was only assigned to ColdFusion because CF was making the calls to the
ODBC driver. We were using an older version of Sybase Adaptive Server
Anywhere. Once we got everything upgraded the memory leaks stopped.
Fusebox and ColdFusion have always stood firm against the attacks from
uninformed administrators.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Alder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:17 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: Memory Leak
Quick question.
I started using fusebox about 6 months ago. Two sites that were done in
fusebox are now being blaimed for memory overload (or leaks). Even thou
these 2 sites get very little in traffic. The system hoasting these sites is
a P2 128 meg, running NT 4.0 (sp 8 I think) and CF 4.5.2 with all service
packs.
IMHO the 'person' saying fusebox is the cause has there head up the fouth
point of contact.
Opinions?
Lee
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
