I though Fred response was humorous and probably intended to be.... :)
At 06:10 PM 18/04/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Yeah, sure let me dig down into my grab bag of statistical tools I keep
>handy for just this purpose...be right back in about 2 years with the
>results....
>
>Hey, lighten up Fred. You must be working on some dang'nabit hard stuff if
>you're wanting that kind of response to a list posting.
>
>At 03:34 PM 4/18/01, Fred T. Sanders wrote:
> >Could you back this statement up with charts, diagrams, and statistical
> >reports?
> >
> >Fred
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Douglas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 2:14 PM
> >Subject: Re: Index.cfm size
> >
> >
> > > Hey, that's nothing if you consider how a Fusebox application is
> cached in
> > > CF. All the cfincludes are *really* part of the same great big cached
> > > page, so you are really caching a lot more than the index page when
> you do
> > > a Fusebox application!
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
