I've tried it and it was fast, but not for keeping track of form stuff -
more for caching stuff which is held in a dB but rarely changes.
I'm not sure why you'd want to pass 1000 records around in a hidden form
field - what is in the records?
Bert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 08 May 2001 12:00
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: XSLT with Fusebox and JSP and whatever else
>
>
> Hi Bert
>
> >while pondering caching a while back i thought about caching data
> >as static xml files to avoid hitting the dB repeatedly for
> dB content which
> >changes rarely,
>
> I'm considering doing something similar for the same reasons
> except i'm
> passing a WDDX packet
> in a hidden form field (a query object of 1000 records)
>
> >I came to the conclusion that it would be better to cache a
> cfscript block
> >which generates the required data structure (query, array,
> structure etc.)
> >Then you call the cached file, get the data into the CF
> variable, and do
> >with it what you will...
>
> Have you actually tried this? How did you find it performance wise?
>
> Thanks
>
> KOla
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bert Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 08 May 2001 11:32
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: XSLT with Fusebox and JSP and whatever else
>
>
> My understanding of XSLT is limited to knowing what it stands
> for, so this
> may be way off...
> However, while pondering caching a while back i thought about
> caching data
> as static xml files to avoid hitting the dB repeatedly for dB
> content which
> changes rarely, but the performance did concern me.
> I came to the conclusion that it would be better to cache a
> cfscript block
> which generates the required data structure (query, array,
> structure etc.)
> Then you call the cached file, get the data into the CF
> variable, and do
> with it what you will...
>
> Bert
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Louis Zezeran
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 08 May 2001 11:27
> > To: Fusebox
> > Subject: XSLT with Fusebox and JSP and whatever else
> >
> >
> > Our lecturer has been teaching us about XSLT combined with
> XML and it
> > looks very helpful for defining multiple content types (ie
> HTML, WML,
> > cHTML etc etc) however the data must be put into XML first. I
> > have been
> > thinking up some ideas and I am about to put pen to paper (or
> > fingers to
> > keys) on how else to accomplish the task of multiple content
> > types with
> > Fusebox without having to go through XSLT. My main problems
> with XSLT
> > are
> >
> > 1) Speed, it's got to be parsed exra times, but that's not my main
> > concern.
> > 2) If the data wasn't in XML before hand, why convert it
> into XML just
> > so it can be converted back into something else.
> >
> > If the data is already in XML then I can see how it could be very
> > useful.
> >
> > Has anyone use XSLT with or fusebox already? Your input would be
> > appreciated, cheers people!
> >
> > Louis
> >
> >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
