I'd recommend starting from scratch, not because it would
be easier than porting to fusebox, but because you would
end up with much higher quality code.
See http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?RefactorMercilessly
Patrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 1:27 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: Porting Old Site
>
>
> I'd like some advice from the FB crowd...
>
> I'm reworking a site that was kind of built in fits and starts
> over the past
> few years. The thought at first was that I'd just change code that is
> affected by the new data integrity restraints in the database,
> but as I get
> into it I'm starting to think that rewriting from the ground up
> might be the
> better option.
>
> Here's some details...the current site was NOT done with fusebox but
> eventually we'd like to port it that way. We're not changing any of the
> screens at this point -- it's all behind the scenes changes.
>
> So, since we have a new database, and we have a prototype (the current
> working site), I'm thinking we'll have fewer headaches if we just
> build the
> new fused site now, instead of tweaking this one and porting it to fusebox
> later.
>
> Has anyone done this kind of thing? Am I correct in thinking it won't take
> longer to build from the ground up -- especially since the
> current site can
> be used as a spec?
>
> Thanks.
>
> ..jj..
>
> - - - - -
> Get your free email account: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sign up at http://www.alakazam.com
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
