> The big problem I see is anybody can come along and delete > content, or alter > somebody else's content without their knowing. Actually, that doesn't happen, or it happens very rarely, and the effects are minimal. Especially since the Fusebox community is already so civilized, I can't see it ever becoming an issue. (And yes, there are ways to roll back edits, just in case.) Patrick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Kola Oyedeji
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Patrick McElhaney
- Re: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Ken Wilson
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Hal Helms
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION.... Patrick McElhaney
- Testing the new email address, ple... Fred T. Sanders
- Re: Testing the new email addr... Douglas Smith
- Re: Testing the new email addr... Fred T. Sanders
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Brian Shearer
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) McCollough, Alan
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Patrick McElhaney
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) BORKMAN Lee
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) BORKMAN Lee
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Stacy Young
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) BORKMAN Lee
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Bob Silverberg
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Stacy Young
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Hal Helms
- RE: RTFFW (was: RIGID STANDARDISATION...) Shane Johnson
