I guess it would be difficult to use the test results if they were presented
like:
a) Application A was non-FB and took 50ms to load.
b) Application B was FB (but we removed the FB architecture) and took 50ms
to load.
Results: An app which was a FB design then re-fitted to resemble the
architecture of a non-FB was just as fast as the non-FB application.
:)
(ok ok an over-simplification but u get my point...no?)
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McElhaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 9:35 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Why Benchmark?
> Well, it may be that we just have different goals.
Actually, I don't have a goal. I was suggesting a way to help with your
goal. :)
> My goal is NOT to see how
> much faster a fusebox app would be without the overhead, but to see in
> a real-world application, the speed differences between FB and non-FB.
Enlighten me, your Halness! How is "the speed difference between FB and
non-FB" different from "how much faster a fusebox app would be without the
overhead"? I can't wait to see the actual test. Maybe that
will clear it up for me.
Patrick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
