Brad,
After I wrote the last response, I was thinking that cfincluded or cfmoduled
files should be counted as separate files. Your tool initially starts with e
cfdirectory, which will capture all the files anyway. Another issue I was
thinking about was the need to supply an images directory path. As you
stated in your readme, you'd like to eliminate this need. That would make
the tool rely on the src attribute of the img tag. But as we see in many
Fusebox applications, part of the src attribute may be generated dynamically
in the application - #attributes.imagepath#. I'm not sure what do about that
yet, but I was thinking about it.
---
Jeffrey B. Marsh
Professionals built the Titanic.
Amateurs built the Ark.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:18 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Document Weight utility
That's a really good idea. I originally created it to check static html
files, so I didn't even think about cfincludes. If it counted cfincludes,
would you want it to count them again as separate templates? There's a lot
of thought rambling though my brain.
This could really evolve into a complete site analysis tool. Maybe include
some stuff like Steve Nelson's STOMP app for checking errors, image
compression, meta tag creator, ....okay, I'd better stop while I'm ahead.
Is there another product like this on the market or in the CF community?
I'd be willing to devote some more time to the development of a tool like
this.
Brad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marsh, Jeffrey B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:58 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: Document Weight utility
>
>
> Brad,
>
> Great tool! In addition to the improvements you mention in the readme, do
> you think there is a need to count any cfincludes or cfmodule files as
> dependencies of the original file? Or will those files and all their
> dependencies be counted in their own right? I can see where one
> could really
> get wrapped around the axel developing a tool like this.
>
> ---
> Jeffrey B. Marsh
> Professionals built the Titanic.
> Amateurs built the Ark.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:35 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: Document Weight utility
>
> Here's the link:
> http://www.cfgoodies.com/
>
> If you have problems downloading it, contact me off list and I'll
> send it to
> you.
>
> Brad
> ******************************************************************
> **********
> This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are
> not the intended addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended
> addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or
> distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the
> message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately
> advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you very
> much.
> ******************************************************************
> **********
> ******************************************************************
> **********
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
