I think Fb and MX are independend of one another. One might think of Fb as the style of the painter (impresionist, baroke, LSD-induced), while MX represents the particular paints (watercolors, oils, enamel)
So, I suspect we'll see future mods to the Fb core that will capitalize on MX functionality, and it should be. But I don't see Fb becoming unnecessary. If anything, with more tools available it's all the more important to have some order in place, and that's what Fb brings to the table, imho. > -----Original Message----- > From: Timothy Heald [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Fusebox > Subject: RE: FuseBox Question > > Ok, > Seriously this is getting out of hand. I would say take it to FB > Community > but this is the wrong list. > > Really though. Some people cannot receive a lot of email during a > day, and > others this is just annoying. > > Anyone have opinions on the future of Fb in the MX environment? > > Tim Heald > ACP/CCFD :) > > Application Development > www.schoollink.net > > Fusebox Advisory Committee Member > www.fusebox.org > > Manager Fayetteville ColdFusion User Group > www.fcfug.org > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: McCollough, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:28 PM > > To: Fusebox > > Subject: RE: FuseBox Question > > > > > > Well, I guess I'll post all future messages to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Christopher and Gina Fox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:26 AM > > > To: Fusebox > > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question > > > > > > Please don't send me any more emails. I'm into the coldfusion / > fusebox > > > thing but I want out of the loop. I just opened my inbox and received > > > about > > > twenty-five emails of your exchange. It's a bit of a pain. > > > > > > Thanks > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:19 PM > > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > > > Why useless? The question was as to the origin date. I supplied it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for all the useless information. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Jeff McNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:02 PM > > > > > Subject: RE: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that 1988 or 1998??? > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff McNeill | http://jeffmcneill.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:57 AM > > > > > > To: Fusebox > > > > > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > April 8, 1988 - Todd Mathews posted a call to action for a > common > > > > > > framework. > > > > > > April 8, 1988 - The common framework was hammered out some and > the > > > name > > > > > > fusebox was applied. April 9, 1988 - Josh Cyr posted up the > first > > > > > > fusebox resource site April 10, 1988 - Michael Dinowitz set up a > > > fusebox > > > > > > forum and mailing list on HoF > > > > > > > > > > > > Hows that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I may be wrong here, but when was FuseBox developed? I > > thought it > > > was > > > > > > > in the year 2000 but someone has told me that they have been > > > working > > > > > > > with it since 1998. Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert Bailey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
