I think Fb and MX are independend of one another. One might think of Fb as
the style of the painter (impresionist, baroke, LSD-induced), while MX
represents the particular paints (watercolors, oils, enamel)

So, I suspect we'll see future mods to the Fb core that will capitalize on
MX functionality, and it should be. But I don't see Fb becoming unnecessary.
If anything, with more tools available it's all the more important to have
some order in place, and that's what Fb brings to the table, imho.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy Heald [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:46 AM
> To:   Fusebox
> Subject:      RE: FuseBox Question
> 
> Ok,
>       Seriously this is getting out of hand.  I would say take it to FB
> Community
> but this is the wrong list.
> 
>       Really though.  Some people cannot receive a lot of email during a
> day, and
> others this is just annoying.
> 
>       Anyone have opinions on the future of Fb in the MX environment?
> 
> Tim Heald
> ACP/CCFD :)
> 
> Application Development
> www.schoollink.net
> 
> Fusebox Advisory Committee Member
> www.fusebox.org
> 
> Manager Fayetteville ColdFusion User Group
> www.fcfug.org
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McCollough, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:28 PM
> > To: Fusebox
> > Subject: RE: FuseBox Question
> >
> >
> > Well, I guess I'll post all future messages to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:     Christopher and Gina Fox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent:     Monday, July 01, 2002 10:26 AM
> > > To:       Fusebox
> > > Subject:  Re: FuseBox Question
> > >
> > > Please don't send me any more emails.  I'm into the coldfusion /
> fusebox
> > > thing but I want out of the loop.  I just opened my inbox and received
> > > about
> > > twenty-five emails of your exchange.  It's a bit of a pain.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:19 PM
> > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question
> > >
> > >
> > > > Why useless? The question was as to the origin date. I supplied it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for all the useless information.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Jeff McNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:02 PM
> > > > > Subject: RE: FuseBox Question
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is that 1988 or 1998???
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jeff McNeill | http://jeffmcneill.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:57 AM
> > > > > > To: Fusebox
> > > > > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > April 8, 1988 - Todd Mathews posted a call to action for a
> common
> > > > > > framework.
> > > > > > April 8, 1988 - The common framework was hammered out some and
> the
> > > name
> > > > > > fusebox was applied. April 9, 1988 - Josh Cyr posted up the
> first
> > > > > > fusebox resource site April 10, 1988 - Michael Dinowitz set up a
> > > fusebox
> > > > > > forum and mailing list on HoF
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hows that?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I may be wrong here, but when was FuseBox developed? I
> > thought it
> > > was
> > > > > > > in the year 2000 but someone has told me that they have been
> > > working
> > > > > > > with it since 1998. Thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Robert Bailey
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> 
______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to