Yes I have. Why, is there something there that helps with the MVC pattern? (hopefully this is on-topic enough ;-)
Stacy Young wrote: > > Have you had a chance to get on the Neo Beta program? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: MVC Pattern > > Thanks Stacy. Yeah, I tried Request too, I was just hoping to get away > from "request.query.field", but since everything is called as a module I > > think there is no way around it. Its not a big deal, just something you > > sort of need to know up front so you can plan for it. > > Regarding the directory layout of the MVC circuits, I agree that keeping > > each circuit as a separate MVC 'unit' seems to make sense to me, but > I'll see what Hal or the others think about that. Maybe there is a > reason for keeping them all under one MVC directory and I just don't > know what it is yet. ;-) > > Stacy Young wrote: > > > > Hey Brian, good point man. (on the folder arrangement)...as for the > > queries, > > have you tried setting them to request scope? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:34 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: MVC Pattern > > > > Hal (or anyone else who might know), > > > > I was playing with the MVC pattern again last night and created some > > nice little shopping cart and product list circuits that use MVC. I > > have two questions: > > > > First, when breaking these down into Model, View, and Controller > > circuits, is it better to do this: > > > > parent > > model > > cart > > products > > view > > cart > > procucts > > controller > > cart > > products > > > > or this: > > > > parent > > mvccart > > model > > view > > controller > > mvcproducts > > model > > view > > controller > > > > it seems to me the second one would make it easier to 'drag and drop' > > these mvc components because each is self contained. > > > > My second question is, did anyone ever find a way around having to > > reference queries and result sets using "caller.myquery" and in the > > output using "caller.myquery.productid"? Or is this just a side effect > > of the MVC setup and it must be that way? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > --- ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
