I use;
<file name="~self~?fuseaction=~xfa.fuseaction~" comments="custom
tag" />
Would it be ok to also add custom variables?
<file name="~self~" fuseaction="~xfa.fuseaction~" />
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fuseoc'ing CFMODULE?
You mean using a <cfmodule> to retrieve something to be used in the
fuse? There is no such convention, because it doesn't involve the io of
the fuse.
For example, you have a routine that reads an SSN and tells you what
state it was issued in. You have a fuse where you want that routine
used via <cfmodule>:
<io>
<in>
<string name="SSN" scope="attributes" comments="Use cfmodule to
/stuff/SSNState.cfm' to get state">
</in>
</io>
Typically you want to avoid dictating how the work should be done in the
Fusedoc, but if you must do something of that nature, comments
attributes or note elements are the way to go.
- Jeff
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:29 AM, Brian Kotek wrote:
> Anyone know the convention for describing a CFMODULE call in a Fusedoc?
> Should the FILE descriptor be used, or something else?
>
> ---
>
>
>
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and
affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail
message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue
Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
