oooops - non FB3 compliant example, as HTML, HEAD, and BODY are (we presume)
handled by fbx_layouts - i better clarify before i get shot.

Still, the concept is valid:
cfinclude template="dsp_StuffBeforeTable1.cfm"
cfinclude template="dsp_Table1.cfm"
cfinclude template="dsp_StuffBetweenTheTables.cfm"
cfinclude template="dsp_Table2.cfm"
cfinclude template="dsp_StuffAfterTable2.cfm"

/t

----- Original Message -----
From: t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Queries and display files


> Tom,
>
> Remember that the browser doesn't care how many files originally contained the
> html used to make up a logical page - ie you could include other dsp files
which
> contain the rest of the html used to draw your page:
>
> cfinclude template="dsp_HtmlHeadandBody.cfm"
> cfinclude template="dsp_Table1.cfm"
> cfinclude template="dsp_WhateverGoesBetweenTheTables.cfm"
> cfinclude template="dsp_Table2.cfm"
> cfinclude template="dsp_CloseBodyandHtml.cfm"
>
> That will work if you absolutely, positively don't want to cfinclude
> dsp_Table1.cfm and dsp_Table2.cfm from within another file... the tradeoff is
> that it will be much harder to change that logical page - you may have to edit
> up to five files...
>
> /t
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tom Schreck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 5:39 PM
> Subject: RE: Queries and display files
>
>
> Thank you Billy.  This helps out a lot.
>
> I have a situation where I have the need to have 2 dsp_XXX pages show up under
> the same <cfcase> in fbx_switch.  If FB3 methodology prefers you not
<cfinclude>
> one of the files inside the other, then how do you control where to place the
2
> files?  Each individual file is developed as a standalone <table>, so how do I
> control the positioning?
>
> Thanks - Tom
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cravens, Billy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Queries and display files
>
>
> The premise behind Fusebox is encapsulation and "black boxing".  Each
> fuse does its own thing, and doesn't need to know what other fuses do.
> All it needs to know is what data to expect.  The connections and
> dependencies are handled by the application files (fbx_)
>
> You're right - when moving fuses, you would need to have the correct
> data moving along with it.  This is why we use Fusedocs.  When I move
> dsp_searchResults, I know that I need a recordset named rsSearchResults.
> Now, that recordset may come from my existing qry_getSearchResults.  Or
> I may move it to a new application, and provide it with a new file,
> qry_newSearchResults, or a qry_ file that already exists in my new
> application that returns the appropriate data.  The beauty is that I
> wire this up at the application level without having to modify
> dsp_searchResults (as you would in your example)
>
> This applies within circuits as well.  Many times I use fuses in
> multiple fuseactions that don't always use the same combination of files
> (only the definition of the data is static)
>
> If I will be using the original qry_ file, I only have to look at my
> fbx_switch to determine dependencies.  This way, I know that's the only
> place I ever have to look.  Otherwise, everytime you move fuses, you'll
> always have to scan the fuses for <cfinclude> tags, rather than relying
> on the consistent structure of fbx_switch and fusedocs (which are always
> in the same place)
>
> ---
> Billy Cravens
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Schreck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Queries and display files
>
> I have the queries located in their own file, I cfinclude/cfmodule them
> into the page needing the recordset.  Why should you cfinclude/cfmodule
> a query inside the <cfcase> of the fbx_switch file versus
> cfinclude/cfmodule the queries inside the dsp_XXX file itself.  When you
> want to re-use dsp_XXX somewhere else, you have to remember to also call
> the appropriate queries.  If, on the other hand, the queries are already
> cfinclude/cfmodule inside the dsp_XXX file then you are good to go.  So,
> I'm wondering from a design perspective why I would separate the query
> calls outside of the dsp file needing the recordset?
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson Winters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Queries and display files
>
>
> A couple other reasons are:
>
> 1. Separate queries into their own file in case a dba who doesn't know
> CF
> very well can access the queries without messing up anything else.
>
> 2. To provide modularity so that the same query can get used in multiple
> fuseactions.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Douglas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Queries and display files
>
>
> > One reason is so that the index file becomes more self-documenting.
> You
> > can see straight from the index file, the dependencies of any given
> > fuseaction.  If you modify a query fuse, you can do a quick scan of
> the
> > index file to see which pages/fuseactions it will affect, and you know
> that
> > you will need to test those fuseactions also.
> >
> > At 02:25 PM 3/28/02 -0600, you wrote:
> > >I know true FB3 methodology calls for separating query fuses from
> display
> > >fuses, but does this not produce more work having to remember to
> include
> > >calls to queries 1,2, and 3 before calling display page X?  What's
> the
> > >reason for not putting all necesarry query calls within the display
> page
> > >itself?
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >Tom Schreck
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >817-252-4900
> > >
> > >I have not failed.  I've found 10,000 ways that won't work.
> > >
> > >- Thomas Edison

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to