No Billy... inside of the Committee (how things are included, how standards are set, how the technology advances).
I like the methodology used by Linux and also the W3C council. Just like a good methodology has advanced programming web sites... a.k.a. FuseBox. A good methodology is key to standards boards. That is why I would like to help by getting something like the W3C style of processing suggestions for standards as key to the FuseBox committee. The public would be aware of what was actually proposed, and able to make comments. The results and time line for issues would also be online. That would give programmers and business users of FuseBox the ability to be proactive with advances to the FuseBox standards. John Farrar >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/11/02 10:24AM >>> Easy enough to learn how things work on the inside - the source code isn't encrypted or in binary format, you know :-) --- Billy Cravens -----Original Message----- From: John Farrar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Committee Nominations When are the nominations going to close and when are we going to have a vote. If someone would like me to work on the board... maybe Hal could nominate me? Would love to know how things work on the inside of this engine! Thanks, John Farrar ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
