Hi Lee, Thanks for the reply!
I think what confused me a little was the tutorial on the halhelms site. He took the core FB files and renamed it to suit the type of ciruit he was building(UserManager). It would seem that a more general title would be more appropriate place to house the 'core' FB files. Logically, it would seem like these core files should reside in a separate folder and then individual circuits be placed in different folders. Is this the approach fro FB apps? If not, what are the best practices in this regard? Thanks! Lee Borkman wrote: > Hi B, > > Generally, the only files you need in a circuit are: > a.. fbx_settings.cfm > b.. fbx_switch.cfm > c.. fbx_layouts.cfm > If you want a circuit to be the home circuit, then you need to add: > a.. fbx_fusebox30_CF50.cfm (or whatever version you need) > b.. fbx_circuits.cfm > All of these files can or should be changed to implement your > application except the FB3 core file (ie., fbx_fusebox30_CF50.cfm or > equivalent). > > Within each circuit, the fbx_switch will usually define all of your > fuseactions, which will actually be implemented by cfinclude-ing small > fuses. > > And if you're worried about "circuits vs fuses", just remember this: > Application -> Circuits -> FuseActions -> Fuses > Hoping that helps some, > LeeBB > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi All, > > I am really interested in understanding the fusebox methodology, but I > am getting a little hung up on the "circuits" vs. "fuses" and what files > > are required for each. > > I downloaded the core FB 3.0 files and checked out the presentation that > > build the simple USerManager app. Now, is the UserManager app > considered a 'circuit'? If so, If I were to create another 'circuit' to > handle 'Contacts' for example, would I need to copy all those 'core > files' into another folder named 'Contacts' or is only one copy of the > core files required per entire FB application? > > Also, I bought the 2.0 white papers last summer, but just never got > around to using/reading them, as I just had no time. Now, is there a > similar document for 3.0, or is it just the one that exists on > fusebox.org? 3.0 seems on first glance to be a good bit different than > 2.0, so I am wondering, would it be best to not read/study the doc I > have. > > Finally, the 'fusedocs' is there a way to expedite their creation for > each template? And is the 'fusedoc' required? > > > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
