RE: session var overhead vs reusibility

Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:29:33 -0700

Title: Message
OK. Cool.
 
How do you do "performance profiling"? Do you mean looking at the execution times for each template? Or do you do something more fancy?
 
I'm quite interested in optimizing performance for this site - it's could potentially be quite high traffic. All the content is outside of the web root and cfcontent'd in, and that is perfomance hit in itself. So I'd like to minimize everything else.
 
K.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Borkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2002 11:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: session var overhead vs reusibility

Up to you, Kay ;-)

If it's a large copy, then by all means put it in its own fuse, and explicitly call it only when you need it.

If it's a trivial copy, then do it globally.  Optimise later if you find it's necessary.

Remember Bjork's Optimisation Rule One: First do it the nice way. Then do performance profiling.  Then, and only then, optimise as necessary.  All else is waste.

See ya,
LeeBB

----- Original Message -----

 
LeeBB:
> But it's more usual to do the initial copy from the session scope in
your fbx_settings.

Hmm... but once again that's presuming that I need that struct in every
request. Isn't that bad from a performace point of view? This is a
structure of 10-15 other structures. Or is that not much data?

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to