Thanks all.... your feedback is appreciated. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > These are almost always preference issues. These are the guidelines I > follow. If what is currently (or latently) part of a larger fuse but > can re > used elsewhere in its own right, I would create a separate fuse. > > Overall I like to make our projects and applications as > understandable/transparent to other Fuseboxers as possible, I try to > avoid > very long fuses. > > Those are my thoughts...briefly for once. > > Kind Regards - Mike Brunt, CTO > Webapper > http://www.webapper.com > Downey CA Office > "Webapper - Making the NET work" > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How atomic does each fuse need be? > > > Hi all, > > I'm doing something very basic here, and I thought it would serve as a > good place to make sure I'm on the right track. It may just come down > to a matter of preference, but I'd just liek to double check. > > I need to display listing of records and then the individual records > detail. > > I was thinking about having two fuses: qry_records & dsp_records, and > just using conditional logic in both the query fuse and the display fuse > to determine both what query to run and which format to display. > > Is this wrong? I mean, I can certainly break it down into 2 query fuses > and two display fuses, but is this necessary? I know this is a simple > example, but it will serve to better understand just how atomic each > fuse needs to be. > > Thanks! > > > > > >
==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
