I think Lee F's question was about file access considerations.  When a CF
template is first read, it is compiled and cached.  When the compiled code
is run from the cache, the comments can have absolutely no effect.  But if
you have trusted cache turned off, then the CFAS has to verify that the file
has not changed.  So does it take any longer to verify this if the file size
is large?  I don't believe so, but that would depend on exactly how the
AppServer/OS actually figures that out.  I suspect that this decision is
simply made on the basis of looking at the date stamp and possibly the file
size, without having to actually read the file.

Of course, surprise surprise, I could be wrong ;-)

LeeBB


-----Original Message-----
From: Dray, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]


Lee Foster said:  

"I have an opinion style question.  I know and understand the purpose of
fusedocs and by no way I'm I against it.  (Trying to dodge any possible
bullets).  Ok here is the question.  On a web server with a heavy load is it
possible that the increase file size could cause or aid in performance
issues.  In this case would it be better to create a separate file with the
fusedoc and make a single line reference in the template to it." 

My gut feeling was that CFAS munches through comments without skipping a
beat. I wrote a little test to verify this hunch. ...

Both test pages run 50,000 iterations in 37 seconds on my development
server. I see no real difference between them. The time spent in the actual
inc_* files is negligible compared to the time in the test_* files.



IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used by
the named addressee.  It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you.  If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender.  You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient.  The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to
this e-mail or attachment to it.  

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to