John, The next step is getting ourselves organized, and then it's down to business on the steering list, where I hope to see your continued input. The more people that partake on the steering list (its purpose is to further develop Fusebox), the better results we'll get. The steering committee has the added responsibility of organizing, discussing, and debating what issues from the steering list rise to the next level, to be considered for the spec.
-Erik John Farrar wrote: > Ditto on the congratulations... hope the task is are rewarding as the > challenges that arise. What is the next step and what should the > non-board members expect to happen next? When? > > Thanks, > > John Farrar > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/07/02 11:00AM >>> > Congratulations the the elected officials of the first Fusebox > standards committee: > > 1 - Lee Borkman > 2 - David Huyck > 3 - Patrick McElhaney > 4 - Stacy Young > 5 - Erki Esken > 6 - Kathryn Butterly > 7 - John Beynon > 8 - Benjamin Edwards > 9 - Tom Nunamaker > 10 - Timothy Heald > 11 - Alan McCollough > 12 - Kay Smoljak > 13 - Birgit Pauli-Haack > > Thank you to all the fine candidates who ran for a spot on the > committee. You are a very talented group of individuals. > > Regards, > The Fusebox Council: > Steve Nelson > Hal Helms > Nat Papovich > Jeff Peters > John Quarto-von Tivadar > Erik Voldengen > > > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
