Anybody else notice at the CF_North conference that Hal names his xfa like this: XFA_whatever instead of XFA.whatever?
Is this something that I missed? Rich -----Original Message----- From: John Beynon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Fusedoc XFAs I was wondering if that was coming next... <IN> <string name="XFA.someXFA" optional="no"/> </IN> Jb. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Slatoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 May 2002 18:29 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Fusedoc XFAs > > > Maybe I shoulda asked it this way... How are people > fusedocing their XFAs? > > : Yes, all the time....you can't not document XFAs. > > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET > delivered > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further > information visit http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
