Sorry, Nate!
 
I forgot to say "Thank you".  Constructive comment like yours is very very welcome.  I hope we can make things clearer in just the manner you suggest.
 
Thanks heaps,
Lee
 
----- Original Message -----
 

Hi Nate, ... I hope and believe that your concerns are already being addressed.  Watch this space.
 
See ya,
Lee Borkman
The Fusebox Steering Committee

 ----- Original Message -----

 
A suggestion for FuseBox.  Seperate it -
 
Official FuseBox Methodology  -  Methodologies can be contained in a document and require no files.  They explore best practices for approaching common development tasks.
 
Official FuseBox Framework - This is basically what FB3 is.  It can require files, and take care of issues on a coding level.  You can add the handling of errors and exceptions and other widgets.  Most importantly, it can cater to specific languages.
 
I think many people are turned off by the fact that the FuseBox methodology is now a framework.  This also makes it impossible to actually port FB as a methodology over to other languages like ASP and JSP.
 
I think if the "FB Steer" folks got back to the basics of developing FuseBox as a methodology, and framework for those interested in it, -seperately- you would see many doors open to expanding FB concept on a much larger scale.
 
And no, I don't think this post belongs in community, and therefore - I will not take it there.   =)
 
Everyone's thoughts on this?
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to