Roger I would have to agree with you. Reuse is nice, but I know it is not our main goal where I work. Easy to understand, and easy to maintain is a much bigger standard here. I think that's where XFAs shine. If I need to add a new case lets say, and I write it to do whatever the action is different from the original, all I have to do is change where the XFA in the switch points and it's done.
Tim Heald ACP/CCFD :) Application Development www.schoollink.net > -----Original Message----- > From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: FuseQ and XFAs > > > > John Jonathan Kopanas wrote: > > The whole principle around fusebox is reusability hence you have to use > > XFAs > > to attain that. > > I'd disagree about the "whole principle" part, but even if that's true, > you don't need XFAs. For example, use of the attributes scope means that > the whole app is reusable. It all depends upon what your goals might be. > > -- > Roger > > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
