> so far I haven't heard anyone mention any problems with running > their FB3 compliant code on CFMX
As mentioned, I don't believe it is a problem with Fusebox but with ColdFusion MX. I downloaded one of the example Fusebox apps off of Fusebox.org, unzipped it to the ColdFusion MX wwwroot directory, and tried to run it once before altering it. The error I'm receiving suggests that, in looping over the directAccessFiles list, the index value (File) is a complex object. I'll look into it a bit and do some testing. Benjamin S. Rogers http://www.c4.net/ v.508.240.0051 f.508.240.0057 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin S. Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:40 PM Subject: RE: SuperQ functionality with the STANDARD core (Re: MVCquestion) > Steve, > > I converted my own app framework, which differs quite a bit from > Fusebox in the layout department. However, I don't see any reason why > the fusebox method can't be converted. I do think the Fusebox > > I was going to try converting one of the sample layout apps on the > Fusebox site but ColdFusion MX seems to be having some difficulty with > some of the templates. After a bit of debugging, I think the problem > resides in ColdFusion, not the sample apps. I'm going to work on it a > bit more (tonight maybe) and may be posting a bug to the Macromedia > forums. > > I'll let you know if I make any progress. Sorry. > > Benjamin S. Rogers > http://www.c4.net/ > v.508.240.0051 > f.508.240.0057 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: SuperQ functionality with the STANDARD core (Re: > MVCquestion) > > > Well that's news to me. I'd be interested in seeing how that works. > > Steve > > "Benjamin S. Rogers" wrote: > > > > > Well it's really going to be a personal preference. Personally for > > > me, Fusebox 3 still solves MUCH more than CFCs do. The web > > > services in CFCs seem great, but I have only needed a web service > > > 2 times in the last year, whereas I've needed nested layouts in > > > EVERY project. > > > > I actually used CFCs for nesting layouts as well. Though I'm sure it > > wasn't exactly what Macromedia intended for CFCs, it works very > > well. Actually, now that I think about, I'm not sure the Allaire > > programmer that wrote the CFInclude tag intended for Fusebox either. > > :) > > > > Benjamin S. Rogers > > http://www.c4.net/ > > v.508.240.0051 > > f.508.240.0057 > > > > > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
