Thanks Patrick. Here's a code block from one of my developers that
really got me thinking about this (variables have been changed to
protect the innocent):
******************
<cfif IsDefined("attributes.frm_id") AND (NOT isThisVar)>
<cfscript>
if (frm_CD EQ '123')
new_CD = closed;
else
new_CD = pending;
SW = SINGLE;
upd_id = attributes.frm_new_id;
</cfscript>
<cfinclude template="qry_updateCD.cfm">
</cfif>
*******************
This used to be in an act_ file. The first reason I pulled it out into
the switch was because it committed what I consider a major sin in
Fusebox--fuses including other fuses. But then I got to thinking about
just how much code you could have in your switch, vs. in includes. This
is also an interesting case, since the cfif results in an include, which
means, if you want to avoid fuses including other fuses, you'd HAVE to
put it in the case (unless you came up with some other approach, like
setting a flag and using the flag further down the case block).
PQ
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
