If you are going to add more things like that to a fusedoc, then it really should follow the bug triage model - the bugfix attribute would be good but maybe it should also have a build number as well.
Neil Clark Team Macromedia http://www.macromedia.com/go/team Announcing Macromedia MX!! http://www.macromedia.com/software/trial/ -----Original Message----- From: Erki Esken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 June 2002 09:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: fusedoc type="" > Sometimes it takes an outside perspective... this ASP guy I have trying > to learn CF and Fusebox while working as primary coder on a huge site > with an impossible deadline has just asked about the fusedoc history tag > "type" attribute. I said, "it's usually create or update". He gave me a > blank look, which made me realise that these two values are pretty > redundant. I mean, we won't be updating a document that has not yet been > created. What does everyone else use this for? > I've been thinking about adding a type="bugfix" and specifing the bug track number in comments or within tag content. Also, I think that type="refactored" or something like that would make sense. No? .erki ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
