> Hal wrote: > > It is really FLiP, ken, but we include that as part of the Fusebox list. > Just a quick explanation of why I try to maintain the separation: we > have quite a few corporate folks onboard who get hassled by their > managers (to the point of making them unsubscribe) if there's a lot of > chatter that isn't related specifically to using FB in their jobs. So > FLiP makes sense on this list, but getting together for beers at CFUN > doesn't(it belongs to the FB-community list). A question about Fusedocs > makes sense, but how we'll use CFCs going forward with Fusebox doesn't > (it belongs to the FB-steer list). Hope that makes sense.
What about a separate list for FLiP? I've thought about it a while and I think it really would be a good idea. To a newcomer who just wants to know about Fusebox all this methodology discussion must surely be confusing. And what about the corporate developers who aren't using FLiP and aren't interested? It would certainly reduce the volume of mail they get. And maybe there are some Fuseboxers out there who would like to know more about FLiP but can't tolerate the current volume of the Fusebox list. It also seems to me that two tightly focused lists will attract less noise than a list that attempts to tightly focus on two generally unrelated subjects. And I'd be lying if I didn't say part of the reason for suggesting this is that I'm tired of being told that FLiP is the only way to develop a web application. (Yes, I know no one is actually saying that but I can sympathize with the CF developers who feel that way about Fusebox.) Patrick ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
