Hi, On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 06:45:10PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: > Olivier Berger <[email protected]> writes: > > > Hi. > > > > You may have heard about Docker [0], a "lightweight containers" solution > > which is becoming quite popular. > > > > I've experimented a bit with it to be able to install FusionForge inside > > a docker container, instead of having to run a full fledged VM [1]. > > > SNIP > > > It's not yet a complete procedure, as some personalization steps are > > required inside the guest to make sure everything runs smoothly, but > > that's a start, at least for basic plugin work in PHP over the DB. > > > > I've improved the procedure by adding another Dockerfile for the last > step, the fusionforge[-minimal] installation, instead of a manual > install + docker commit. > > It allows much more straightforward installation :-) > > See [2] for the section which I've updated accordingly. A trick is to > start postgres before the apt-get install inside the same RUN command, > otherwise docker will kill postgres before processing the installation, > which fusionforge won't like. > > Thanks to Sylvain for the UCF env var setting reminder. > > Again, tests/improvements/comments much welcome.
I was willing to check what was wrong with setuid in docker, and I tried to follow the documentation. I think there are a few things missing, in particular how to initiate the "myfusionforge" registry, and where to store all the config files that are embedded in the wiki page. Also you mention several variants, but as a beginner I have no clue which base image I should use, and I'd like to reproduce _your_ bug situation, so how about *recommending* one (and put the other one in a "variant" subsection, or just ditch it)? -- Sylvain _______________________________________________ Fusionforge-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fusionforge.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fusionforge-general
