Le Monday 06 September 2010 22:34:16 David DURIEUX, vous avez écrit : > Le Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:12:15 +0200 > > Walid Nouh <[email protected]> a écrit: > >Le 06/09/2010 21:49, Fabrice Flore-Thebault a écrit : > >> I propose this reorganisation of the display of the projects in the > >> forge : > >> > >> + FusionInventory Agent > >> ++ agent-tools > >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-backup > >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-fai > >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-ltsp > >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-opsi > >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-netdiscovery > >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-ocsdeploy > >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-snmpquery > >> + FusionInventory for GLPI > >> ++ plugin_fusinvdeploy > >> ++ plugin_fusinvinventory > >> ++ plugin_fusinvsnmp > >> + Libfusioninventory-server-php > >> + Fusioninventory Community > >> + Documentation > > > >I agree with you. > > It looks better in this configuration > > >> - Remove empty project "FusionInventory Server" which has no utility > >> > >> - Question : should we keep "Fusioninventory-ldap" which is still > >> empty ? I would prefer we unpublish it and create it again when > >> development is starting, so it becomes clear that the project has > >> really started. > > > >and where to put it ? what you should this project do ? > >Walid. > > I think it must be an option of agent to get config in LDAP instead > from registry or config file. So this LDAP project must be deleted, > Benoît (bilbo the turtle) confirm it please.
This was to implement ldap method for using goto / fai stuff but will not be there till agent 3.0 with poe so you can safely remove it Cheers -- Benoit Mortier CEO OpenSides "logiciels libres pour entreprises" : http://www.opensides.eu/ Promouvoir et défendre le Logiciel Libre http://www.april.org/ Contributor to Gosa Project : http://gosa-project.org/ _______________________________________________ Fusioninventory-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fusioninventory-devel
