Le Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:35:24 +0200 Guillaume Rousse <[email protected]> a écrit:
>On 17/08/2011 11:06, David DURIEUX wrote: >> Do you think how to use in future netInventory to get >> informations too by http? You put in same module or in another? >> Perhaps name it snmpinventory instead netinventory? >If it perform the same role, it should be in the same module (unless >exception dependencies), the user does not have to be exposed to >internal implementation details. Hence the use of a name focusing on >functionality rather than technology. Okay, let's go for 'NetInventory' ;) _______________________________________________ Fusioninventory-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fusioninventory-devel
