Hi! I thought the fields were defined by Fusion and not by GLPI... What do you mean by generic enough?
I think Asset Tag is well defined. OCS, for example, has a field to this information. Some computers don't have, but I think this is not a problem (it occurs with other fields). Sorry, but where I can register a feature request? Thanks! Mário Jorge de Sousa Freire Analista de Informática Legislativa Câmara dos Deputados CENIN/CAINF/SEGES - (61) 3216-3763 [email protected] -----Mensagem original----- De: fusioninventory-user-bounces+mario.freire=camara.gov...@lists.alioth.debian.org [mailto:fusioninventory-user-bounces+mario.freire=camara.gov...@lists.alioth.debian.org] Em nome de Gonéri Le Bouder Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de junho de 2012 16:16 Para: FusionInventory User discussion Assunto: Re: [Fusioninventory-user] XML not fully used 2012/6/15 Mario Jorge de Sousa Freire <[email protected]>: > Hi, David & friends! > > Why some information available in XML is not stored in any field (e.g.: > Asset Tag)? Is this going to change in a future version? Hi Mario, In general, the question is more: Where to store it in GLPI? If there is no field yet in GLPI, is it generic enough? And if so, is there a feature request somewhere? Cheers, -- Gonéri Le Bouder _______________________________________________ Fusioninventory-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fusioninventory-user _______________________________________________ Fusioninventory-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fusioninventory-user
