In a message dated 11/6/98 9:35:03 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< But another thought has crossed my mind recently.  We must not overlook
that
 when the Soviet Union collapsed, Russia lost its eastern European satellites
 and its ties with its former republics were greatly weakened.  The
 impression one gets from talking with people from former satellites such as
 Poland or Hungary is that, over a four decade period, the Russians bled
 these countries dry.  The republics were bled over a much longer period.
 One cannot help but wonder about the extent to which the loss of the ability
 to bleed affected Russia.  How dependent was Russia on a continuous flow of
 tribute from its empire?  To what extent did Russia have an economy of its
 own, and to what extent was it dependent on the economies of others?  Look
 at it this way: At least some eastern European countries are now thriving
 while Russia continues to decline. >>

Yes but.

The Central Asia countries were bleeding Russia and other dry in the FSU.
This would at least partially offset the SU using the Eastern European
satellites as economic colonies.

Unlike Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, Russia had no prior experience
in capitalism.

Jerry Harp

Reply via email to